Stagecraft and Statecraft. With the passage of time, the transactional elements in the U. S. Indian partnership have become more conspicuous than the geostrategic dimensions, compounding Indias security dilemmas. Brahma Chellaney, Open magazine. U. S. President Donald Trump made it known during his presidential election campaign that he likes India and Indians. Yet, in office, Trump has taken a series of steps in the immigration and trade realms that have adversely impacted India. Prime Minister Narendra Modi had a good first ever meeting with Trump, although it yielded few deliverables. The two will have another opportunity to meet soon when Germany hosts the annual G 2. Hamburg. Yet it is still not clear how salient India will be in the Trump foreign policy. Sony Pc Companion For Xperia Arc S there. This is largely because Trumps larger geopolitical policy framework is still evolving. The U. S. India strategic partnership is essentially founded on two pillars a U. S. commitment to assist, in Americas own interest, Indias rise and a shared interest in building an inclusive, stable, rules based Asian order to help manage Chinas muscular rise. The hope in India has been that the U. S. would assist its rise in the way it aided Chinas economic ascent since the 1. President Jimmy Carter, for example, sent a memo to various U. S government departments instructing them to help in Chinas rise. Even Chinas firing of missiles into the Taiwan Strait in 1. If anything, the U. S. has gradually loosened its close links with Taiwan, with no U. S. Cabinet member visiting that island since those missile manoeuvres. East West Colossus Serial Number' title='East West Colossus Serial Number' />Latest breaking news, including politics, crime and celebrity. Find stories, updates and expert opinion. Offers news, comment and features about the British arts scene with sections on books, films, music, theatre, art and architecture. Requires free registration. Our film critics on blockbusters, independents and everything in between. Gomer and Hosea. A Prophecy of the Western Church A study by Gavin Finley MD endtimepilgrim. Feb. 2003. Image used by permission of Christian dramatist Anita. BY BRAHMA CHELLANEY, The Japan Times. China, the worlds communist behemoth, is at a turning point in its history, one that will have profound implications for the. U. S. policy, effectively, helped turn China into an export juggernaut, which today sells 4 worth of goods to the U. S. for each 1 of imports. In the process, just as the U. S. inadvertently saddled the world with the jihadist scourge by training Afghan mujahedeen the anti Soviet guerrillas out of which Al Qaeda evolved it unintentionally created a rules violating monster by aiding Chinas economic rise. Abusing free trade rules, China has systematically subsidized its exports while impeding imports to shield domestic jobs and industry. In effect, China has grown strong and rich by quietly waging a trade war. Trump said he told Chinese President Xi Jinping during their Mar a Lago summit in April that weve rebuilt China with the money youve taken out of the United States. India wants the U. S. to buttress the two central pillars of their strategic partnership. Washingtons China opening of 1. US National Security Adviser Henry Kissinger, was designed in the wake of the 1. Sino Soviet military clashes to exploit the rift in the Communist world by aligning China with Americas anti Soviet strategy. The result was that China, in the second half of the Cold War, became Washingtons partner against the Soviet Union. Activation Code Norton Antivirus 2004. By comparison, there is no tectonic geopolitical development or calculation motivating the U. S. to assist Indias rise. Rather, the main driver is a transactional calculation that an economically booming India, just like Chinas economic ascent, will be good for American businesses. Make no mistake U. S. foreign policy is inherently transactional, with commerce the central plank. Indeed, Trumps recent visit to the worlds chief ideological sponsor of jihadism, Saudi Arabia, was a reminder that money speaks louder than the international imperative to counter a rapidly metastasizing global jihadist threat. The visit yielded business and investment deals for the U. S. valued at up to almost 4. Trump previously accused of being complicit in 91. Trumps immediate two predecessors, Barack Obama and George W. Bush, did not hide their transactional approach toward a warming relationship with India. For example, the landmark nuclear deal, unveiled in 2. India boosting its defence transactions with the United States. Consequently, India has emerged as a top U. S. arms client in a matter of years, even as the 1. Trumps weakness, for which he has been widely lampooned, is that he is publicly mercantile and transactional in his foreign policy approach. His being so commerce oriented upfront, rather than quietly, as was the case under his predecessors, does not, of course, signify a shift in U. S. policy focus. For example, in the past, the American demand for Indian steps to correct Indias large trade surplus with the U. S. was made in private by a president or publicly by one of his Cabinet members. But Trump articulated that demand forthrightly in his opening remarks at the joint news conference with Modi. It is important that barriers be removed to the export of U. S. goods into your markets, and that we reduce our trade deficit with your country, he stated. The mutual admiration on display during the visit with Trump lavishing praise on Modi and calling him a true friend, and Modi returning the favour to laud Trumps vast and successful business experience could not obscure the U. S. India divergence on regional security issues. The Modi visit speeded up Washingtons decision to fill the vacant position of U. S. ambassador to India by naming Kenneth Juster, a senior White House official. Hopefully, the visit will also accelerate the separate inter agency reviews currently being conducted in Washington on Americas Pakistan and Afghanistan policies. Take Afghanistan For nearly 1. U. S. has been stuck in Afghanistan in the longest and most expensive war in its history. It has tried several policies to wind down the war, including a massive military surge under Obama to compel the Taliban to sue for peace. Nothing has worked, in large part because the U. S. has continued to fight the war on just one side of the Afghanistan Pakistan divide and refused to go after the Pakistan based sanctuaries of the Taliban and its affiliate, the Haqqani network. As Gen. John Nicholson, the U. S. military commander in Afghanistan, acknowledged earlier this year, It is very difficult to succeed on the battlefield when your enemy enjoys external support and safe haven. Red Alert 2 Yuri S Revenge Random Serial Number there. Worse still, the Taliban is conspicuously missing from the U. S. list of Foreign Terrorist Organizations, while the procreator and sponsor of that medieval militia Pakistan has been one of the largest recipients of American aid since 2. U. S. invasion of Afghanistan helped remove the Taliban from power. India is concerned that the U. S. still seeks to preserve the option of reaching a Faustian bargain with the Taliban. No counterterrorism campaign has ever succeeded when militants have enjoyed cross border havens. The Taliban are unlikely to be routed or seek peace as long as they can operate from sanctuaries in Pakistan, where their top leaders are ensconced. Their string of battlefield victories indeed gives them little incentive to enter into serious peace negotiations. U. S. Defence Secretary Jim Mattis in June signalled a potentially tougher approach to safe havens in Pakistan, saying the U. S. will hit the enemy where it is fighting from, which is not just Afghanistan. However, only time will be tell whether this was a rhetorical statement or more. U. S. has long had a blind spot for Pakistan. Today, the key question for Trump on that front is whether to continue the carrots only approach toward Pakistan of Obama and Bush or finally begin to wield the big stick against a country that defiantly remains wedded to terrorism. To be sure, the tough message to Pakistan in the joint U.